Understanding Anti-Money Laundering Laws In Singapore

by 28 March 2025Knowledge & Insights

Understanding Anti-Money Laundering Laws In Singapore

Money laundering is a serious financial crime that threatens economic stability and enables illicit activities such as corruption, fraud, and organised crime.

Singapore has established a robust framework to combat financial crime through stringent anti-money laundering (AML) regulations. This article provides an overview of the key laws, regulations, and compliance requirements related to anti-money laundering in Singapore.

 

What Is Anti-Money Laundering?

Anti-money laundering (AML) encompasses regulations, laws, and procedures aimed at preventing criminals from concealing illicit funds as legitimate earnings.

Money laundering typically involves moving illicit funds through a series of complex transactions to obscure their origin, allowing criminals to integrate their profits into the legal financial system.

AML regulations target various financial crimes, including fraud, corruption, terrorism financing, and organised crime activities. Governments and financial institutions enforce AML measures to identify, prevent, and report suspicious activities that could suggest money laundering.

 

What Are The Laws That Criminalise Money Laundering In Singapore?

What Are The Laws That Criminalise Money Laundering In Singapore

Several laws in Singapore govern the offence of money laundering and impose strict obligations on businesses and financial institutions to prevent illicit financial activities. These laws outline penalties for individuals and entities involved in laundering proceeds from criminal activities, as well as those who fail to report suspicious transactions.

The legal framework ensures that money laundering is detected and prosecuted while discouraging financial crimes. Below are the key AML laws in Singapore:

1. Corruption, Drug Trafficking And Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act (CDSA)

The CDSA is Singapore’s primary legislation that criminalises money laundering and empowers authorities to confiscate assets derived from criminal activities. The Act applies to proceeds from offences such as drug trafficking, corruption, fraud, and organised crime, ensuring that criminals cannot benefit from illegally obtained funds.

The CDSA mandates that financial institutions and businesses report suspicious transactions to law enforcement agencies or risk legal consequences.

Penalties for money laundering under this Act falls under Section 50(1) and Section 51(1) include imprisonment of up to 10 years, fines of up to S$500,000, or both for individuals, while corporations face heavier financial penalties.

2. Monetary Authority Of Singapore (MAS) Act

The MAS Act grants the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) regulatory powers over banks, financial institutions, and payment service providers to enforce AML requirements.

Non-compliance with these AML obligations can lead to significant penalties. For instance, in June 2023, MAS imposed composition penalties totalling S$3.8 million on several financial institutions, including Citibank N.A., Singapore Branch, DBS Bank Ltd, OCBC Singapore, and Swiss Life (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., for breaches of MAS’ AML and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CFT) requirements.

3. Terrorism (Suppression of Financing) Act (TSOFA)

The TSOFA specifically targets terrorism financing, making it a criminal offence to provide, collect, or process funds that could be used to support terrorist activities. The law applies to both individuals and organisations, including financial institutions that fail to conduct proper due diligence on high-risk customers.

Those convicted under TSOFA can face lengthy imprisonment sentences, heavy fines, or both, reinforcing Singapore’s commitment to counter-terrorism financing.

 

How Money Laundering Works

Money laundering generally occurs in three stages:

  1. Placement: Illicit funds are injected into the financial system, typically through cash deposits, gambling establishments, front companies, or structuring transactions into smaller amounts to evade detection.
  2. Layering: Funds are moved through multiple transactions, such as transfers between accounts, offshore banking, or purchasing high-value assets like real estate or luxury goods, to obscure their origin.
  3. Integration: The laundered money is reintroduced into the economy as legitimate funds, often used to finance legal businesses or investments.

 

Money Laundering Offences That Fall Under the CDSA

Money Laundering Offences That Fall Under the CDSA

The CDSA encompasses various offences related to money laundering, including:

Facilitating The Concealment Or Conversion Of Funds Linked To Drug Trafficking Or Criminal Conduct

Under Sections 53(2) and 54(2) of the Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act (CDSA), it is an offence for any person to knowingly assist in the concealment, transfer, or conversion of assets obtained through drug-related or criminal activities.

This applies when an individual is aware, or has reasonable grounds to believe, that the property in question represents proceeds from unlawful activities. Actions such as disguising ownership, transferring funds, or moving illicit assets out of Singapore constitute money laundering offences under this law.

This offence often involves a third party helping a criminal disguise the origins of illicit funds, making them appear legitimate.

For example, a luxury car dealer who knowingly accepts large cash payments from an individual suspected of being involved in illegal activities and processes the transaction without reporting it may be engaging in money laundering.

Similarly, a business owner who agrees to receive and transfer funds on behalf of another person despite suspecting its illegal origin could also be liable under this provision.

Rash And Negligent Money Laundering

As of 9 May 2023, the Singapore Parliament passed amendments to the CDSA, introducing specific offences for rash and negligent money laundering.

Rash Money Laundering

Under the amended CDSA, an individual commits an offence if they engage in a transaction involving property that represents the proceeds of criminal conduct, despite having suspicions about the property’s illicit origin and failing to make reasonable inquiries.

For example, person X is approached through social media with an opportunity to earn quick money. The offer requires him to act as a “financial intermediary,” where he will receive large sums of money in his personal e-wallet and transfer them to multiple recipients.

Each week, he processes transactions exceeding S$80,000, for which he is paid S$1,500 per month. Although Person X finds it unusual that a legitimate business would operate in this manner, he does not question the source of the funds, the identities of the recipients, or the legality of the transactions.

Eventually, investigations reveal that the transferred funds originated from an international fraud syndicate, making Person X liable for rash money laundering.

This offence carries a penalty of a fine not exceeding S$250,000, imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years, or both.

Negligent Money Laundering

The Act also addresses negligent money laundering, where a person enters into a transaction with property that is proceeds of crime, in circumstances where a reasonable person would have suspected the illicit nature of the property.

For example, person Y is offered a freelance job where he is asked to receive and withdraw cash on behalf of a supposed overseas client. He is informed that the client cannot access Singapore’s banking system and needs assistance with processing local payments. In return, Person Y is promised S$500 per transaction for his service.

Without questioning the legitimacy of the arrangement or verifying the identity of the client, he proceeds with multiple cash withdrawals and transfers. It is later discovered that the funds originated from phishing scams, making Person Y guilty of negligent money laundering, as a reasonable person would have recognised the suspicious nature of the transactions.

This offence carries a penalty of a fine not exceeding S$150,000, imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 years, or both.

 

Other Laws That Constitute Anti-Money Laundering In Singapore

Other Laws That Constitute Anti-Money Laundering In Singapore

In addition to the CDSA and MAS, certain provisions under the Penal Code also address money laundering-related offences. These offences impose legal consequences on individuals who knowingly receive, conceal, or assist in handling property obtained through illegal means.

Receiving Stolen Property As Money Laundering

Under Section 411 of the Penal Code (1871), a person is guilty of an offence if they receive or retain stolen property while knowing or having reason to believe it was obtained illegally.

While this provision primarily targets the possession of stolen goods, it can overlap with money laundering offences under the CDSA if further actions are taken to conceal or legitimise the illicit funds.

In 2019, Yap Chen Hsiang Osborn was charged under Section 411 for receiving stolen property. Investigations revealed that he transferred funds through multiple accounts, raising suspicions of money laundering under the CDSA. However, the Court of Appeal ruled that there was insufficient evidence to prove intent to launder the funds.

A conviction under Section 411 carries a prison term of up to 5 years, a fine, or both. If it escalated to money laundering under the CDSA, the penalties may be more severe.

Facilitating The Concealment Or Disposal Of Stolen Property

Under Section 414 of the Penal Code (1871), it is an offence for any individual to knowingly assist in hiding, disposing of, or handling stolen property. A person is guilty if they voluntarily take part in such activities while being aware, or having reasonable grounds to suspect, that the property in question was acquired through unlawful means.

For example, if an individual agrees to resell electronic devices on behalf of another person, despite knowing or suspecting that these items were obtained through fraud, they may be held accountable under this provision.

Similarly, someone who helps move large sums of money through multiple bank accounts, knowing that the funds were obtained through illicit activities, could be charged under this section.

A conviction under Section 414 of the Penal Code carries a prison sentence of up to 5 years, a fine, or both.

 

Conclusion On A Guide To Singapore’s Anti-Money Laundering Laws

Singapore’s anti-money laundering laws serve as a robust framework to prevent financial crimes, safeguarding the country’s financial system from illicit activities. These regulations impose strict compliance requirements on businesses, financial institutions, and individuals to detect and report suspicious transactions.

However, the complexities of AML obligations, enforcement actions, and legal consequences can make compliance a challenging task.

At Tembusu Law, our experienced legal team is well-equipped to assist with AML compliance, regulatory advice, and defence against money laundering charges.

Whether you require guidance on due diligence requirements, corporate AML policies, or legal representation in investigations, we are here to provide expert support.

Contact us today for a consultation and let us help you navigate Singapore’s AML regulations with clarity and confidence.

 

Frequently Asked Questions About A Guide to Singapore’s Anti-Money Laundering Laws

How Can Individuals Be Unknowingly Involved In Money Laundering?

Individuals may unknowingly participate in money laundering by accepting job offers as money mules, renting out their bank accounts, or transferring funds without verifying their source. Criminals often use social media scams or fraudulent investment schemes to recruit unsuspecting individuals. Ignorance is not a defence, and those involved may face legal consequences under the CDSA.

When Can AML Investigations Be Initiated Against A Company Or Individual?

AML investigations can begin if authorities detect suspicious financial transactions, anonymous cash movements, or structured transactions aimed at avoiding detection. Law enforcement agencies, including the Commercial Affairs Department (CAD), may also act based on whistleblower reports or compliance failures identified during regulatory audits.

What Happens If A Business Fails To Implement AML Compliance Measures?

Non-compliance with AML laws can result in substantial fines, criminal prosecution, and revocation of business licences. MAS has the authority to impose penalties on financial institutions, while directors or compliance officers may face personal liability. In severe cases, businesses can be permanently banned from operating in regulated sectors.

Is It A Crime To Transfer Large Amounts Of Money Without Declaring The Source?

Yes. Failing to explain the origin of large financial transactions may be considered money laundering under Sections 43 and 44 of the CDSA. Financial institutions are required to report large cash deposits, rapid fund transfers, and transactions with high-risk jurisdictions. Individuals who knowingly transfer illicit funds, even if instructed by a third party, can be charged with money laundering offences.

How Do Businesses Conduct Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) On High-Risk Clients?

For high-risk clients, businesses must verify identities, assess financial backgrounds, and scrutinise transaction patterns to detect potential money laundering risks. Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) applies to politically exposed persons (PEPs), clients from high-risk countries, and those engaged in cash-intensive businesses. If red flags are identified, businesses must report the case to authorities and implement heightened monitoring.

When Do AML Penalties Increase For Repeat Offenders?

Repeat offenders face escalating penalties, including higher fines, longer imprisonment terms, and permanent bans from financial sectors. Under the CDSA, if an individual or company commits multiple offences, the court may impose cumulative penalties based on the severity and financial impact of the violations. Regulatory authorities may also impose additional restrictions, such as freezing assets or terminating business licences.

About the author

About the author

Tembusu Law

Jonathan is the Founder and Managing Director of Tembusu Law. He is also the founder of LawGuide Singapore, a prominent legaltech startup which successfully created and launched Singapore’s first legal chatbot in 2017.

LET'S TALK

We'll always make time for you. Tell us what's on your mind and we'll find a way to help.