
Contempt of Court is a term we often hear but might not fully understand. Acts of disrespect, disobedience, or interference with a Court or its proceedings, known as Court contempt, can disrupt the legal process and lead to sanctions such as fines, jail, or social service.
It is crucial to ensure that our legal system functions smoothly and fairly. But what does contempt of Court in Singapore mean, and why is it so important?
In this blog, we’ll explain contempt of Court, the different types of contempt, and what happens if someone is found guilty of it. We’ll also look at some real-life examples from Singapore to help illustrate these points.
Whether you’re a legal professional, a student, or just someone interested in learning more about our legal system, this blog will provide clear, easy-to-understand information on this critical topic. Let’s dive in and explore the vital legal insights and implications of contempt of Court.
Meaning Of Contempt Of Court

In Singapore, this concept is defined by law under the Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016. It is not designed to protect judges’ egos but to safeguard the proper administration of justice.
Essentially, contempt of court refers to any action that interferes with the ability of the Court to function effectively and fairly. This could be by:
- Disrespecting the Judiciary: Making baseless attacks on the impartiality of the Judge.
- Prejudicing a Case: Doing something that prevents a fair trial, like influencing witnesses or releasing evidence that has not been presented in Court.
- Ignoring Orders: Refusing to do what the Court has legally commanded you to do.
If the justice system is a machine, contempt is the act of throwing a spanner in the works. The law exists to ensure that when you walk into a courtroom, the process is untainted by outside pressure or internal disruption.
4 Types Of Contempt of Court In Singapore
Legal experts in Singapore generally categorise these offences into four distinct buckets. Each type addresses a specific way that justice can be obstructed.
Scandalising the Court
This is perhaps the most well-known form. It involves publishing statements that allege the Court is biased, corrupt, or improper. It is not about disagreeing with a verdict; it is about attacking the integrity of the system itself. If you imply a Judge made a decision based on personal gain rather than the law, that is scandalising.
Interfering with the Administration of Justice (Sub Judice)
This type of contempt of court in Singapore is crucial in the age of social media. It involves publishing material that prejudges a pending case. If a trial is ongoing and you write a post saying, “He definitely stole that money,” you are usurping the role of the Court. This can unfairly influence the outcome or the public perception of the trial.
Disobedience of Court Orders (Civil Contempt)
This happens when a person intentionally refuses to comply with an order or judgment. This is very common in family law situations, such as a Divorce, where one party refuses to pay maintenance or grant access to children despite a clear mandate from the Court.
Facial Contempt (Contempt in the Face of the Court)
This occurs directly within the courtroom. It includes disruptive behaviour like shouting at the Judge, throwing objects, or refusing to take the witness stand when compelled. It is immediate and stops the proceedings from moving forward.
Examples Of Contempt Of Court
To help you understand where the boundaries lie, we have compiled a table of common scenarios. These examples of contempt of court show how actions, both online and offline, can lead to legal trouble.
| Type of Contempt | Scenario Example | Why It Is Contempt |
| Scandalising | A person posts on Facebook, claiming that a judge ruled only in favour of a corporation because “the courts always protect the rich and powerful.” | This implies bias and a lack of integrity without any factual basis, undermining trust in the judiciary. |
| Sub Judice | A news outlet publishes a detailed analysis of a suspect’s past criminal record while their current robbery trial is still ongoing. | This information is not part of the current trial evidence and could prejudice the Judge or public opinion against the accused. |
| Civil Contempt | In a Divorce case, a father refuses to hand over his passport to the Court as ordered, fearing he will be stopped from travelling. | He is intentionally disobeying a specific Court order intended to ensure his compliance with the legal proceedings. |
| Facial Contempt | A witness becomes angry during cross-examination, starts screaming profanities at the lawyer, and refuses to stop when the Judge orders them to be quiet. | This behaviour disrupts the proceedings and disrespects the Court’s authority in real time. |
Penalties For Contempt
The consequences for contempt of court are severe and defined clearly under the 2016 Act. The punishment depends on which level of Court you are dealing with.
- High Court or Court of Appeal:
- A fine of up to $100,000.
- Imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 years.
- Or both.
- State Courts:
- A fine of up to $20,000.
- Imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months.
- Or both.
The Power of Apology: It is worth noting that the law allows the Court to consider an apology when deciding the punishment. If the offender offers a sincere apology to the Court, the punishment may be reduced or even waived in certain circumstances. However, this is not a “get out of jail free” card; the apology must be genuine and accepted by the Court.
Defences Available
Being accused does not automatically make you guilty. The law provides specific defences that you can raise if you are facing a charge of contempt of court.
- Fair Criticism: You are allowed to criticise a judgment if it is done rationally. If you argue that a Judge made a mistake in interpreting the law and you back it up with logical arguments, that is fair criticism. It becomes contempt only when you attack the Judge’s motives (e.g., accusing them of corruption) without evidence.
- Innocent Publication (for Sub Judice): If you published information about a case but genuinely did not know, and had no reason to believe, that proceedings were pending, you may have a valid defence. This protects people who unknowingly comment on cases before they officially become active in the courts.
- Reports of Proceedings: Fair and accurate reporting of public court proceedings, published in good faith, is generally not contempt. This allows the media to report on trials without fear, provided they stick to the facts presented in Court.
Importance Of Understanding Contempt Of Court

Understanding contempt of Court is crucial for maintaining the rule of law and ensuring the effective administration of justice. It serves several essential functions, each contributing to the integrity and functionality of the judicial system.
Upholds Judicial Authority
Contempt of Court is essential for upholding the judiciary’s authority. Courts rely on the power to punish contempt to enforce their orders effectively. With this power, Courts could compel individuals to adhere to their rulings, leading to chaos and a breakdown in the legal order.
The ability to enforce orders ensures that judicial decisions are respected and followed, maintaining the Court’s role as a judge of justice. Courtrooms are structured environments where legal processes must proceed without interruption.
The state Court has the jurisdiction and power to try and punish for contempt of Court, particularly in relation to maintaining order in Court proceedings. Contempt of Court provisions help maintain decorum and order during proceedings.
Any behaviour that disrupts Court sessions, such as outbursts, interruptions, or disrespectful actions, can be swiftly addressed through contempt charges.
Protects The Rights Of Parties
Courts protect the rights of all parties involved in legal proceedings by punishing contemptuous behaviour. Contempt of Court provisions safeguard the legal process, ensuring that trials and hearings are conducted fairly.
When individuals or entities are held accountable for actions that obstruct justice, it helps to ensure that every party receives a fair and unbiased hearing.
Contempt of Court is a deterrent against actions that could obstruct the judicial process. This includes preventing witness tampering, evidence destruction, or any other behaviour that might compromise the integrity of a case.
Preserves Public Confidence

Contempt of Court provisions help preserve public confidence in the legal system. The Supreme Court has examined the distinction between civil contempt and criminal contempt and provided guidance on dealing with disruptive behaviour in Court proceedings.
When the public sees that the Courts are respected and their orders are enforced, trust in the judicial system is reinforced. People are more likely to comply with legal directives and engage with the legal system when they believe it operates fairly and effectively.
The rule of law is a cornerstone of democratic societies. Contempt of Court provisions ensure that everyone, regardless of status or position, is subject to the law. Public confidence is bolstered when the judiciary consistently and unbiasedly upholds these principles.
Ensures Judicial Efficiency
Understanding contempt of Court also contributes to the overall efficiency of the judicial system. When individuals and entities are aware of the consequences of contemptuous behaviour, they are more likely to comply with Court procedures and orders, reducing delays and obstructions.
Awareness and understanding of contempt of Court can also reduce legal disputes. The Youth Court also plays a role in ensuring compliance with Court orders and reducing legal disputes, particularly in cases involving younger individuals.
When parties understand the seriousness of complying with Court orders and the potential penalties for non-compliance, they are more likely to resolve issues amicably and adhere to legal directives.
Conclusion About The Contempt Of Court In Singapore
Learning the rules around the justice system is essential for everyone, not just lawyers. Whether you are involved in a lawsuit, a Divorce, or simply commenting on high-profile cases online, understanding the boundaries is the best way to protect yourself.
If you find yourself facing allegations or need guidance on a complex legal matter, you need a team that understands the intricacies of the law. At Tembusu Law, we are recognised as some of the best criminal lawyers and Divorce lawyers in Singapore. We are here to provide clear, honest advice tailored to your situation.
Contact us today for a free discovery call and let us help you resolve your legal challenges.
Frequently Asked Questions About The Contempt Of Court In Singapore
Is It Possible To Purge Oneself Of Contempt In Singapore?
Yes, it is possible to purge oneself of contempt in Singapore. Purging contempt involves taking specific actions to rectify contemptuous behaviour.
For example, if someone fails to comply with a Court order, they can adhere to the order to purge cthe contempt. The Court may require an apology or other corrective measures to acknowledge and remedy the contemptuous act.
What Is The Difference Between Civil And Criminal Contempt?
Civil contempt usually involves disobeying a Court order issued for the benefit of another party, such as in a Divorce or business dispute. Criminal contempt typically involves conduct that attacks the justice system itself, such as scandalising the Court or interfering with a trial.
Can Legal Practitioners Be Held In Contempt Of Court?
Yes, legal practitioners can be held in contempt of Court. Lawyers and other legal professionals are expected to uphold high Court conduct standards.
Misleading the Court, failing to follow Court orders, or disrespecting the Court can result in contempt charges against legal practitioners. Such behaviour undermines the legal process and the integrity of the judiciary.
What Is The Role Of The Attorney-General In Contempt Of Court Cases?
The Attorney-General plays a significant role in contempt of Court cases in Singapore. The Attorney-General may initiate contempt proceedings, particularly in cases involving significant public interest or where the contemptuous behaviour threatens the administration of justice on a broader scale.
The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) may also provide legal opinions and advice on matters related to contempt of Court.
How Does Contempt Of Court Interact With Freedom Of Speech In Singapore?
Contempt of Court provisions must balance the need to protect the judiciary’s authority with the right to freedom of speech. While individuals and media organisations can express their opinions and criticise the judiciary, this must be done respectfully and fairly.
Statements that are fact-based and aim to promote transparency and accountability are generally protected, but those that undermine the judiciary’s integrity or obstruct justice may lead to contempt charges. The Courts carefully consider this balance when adjudicating contempt cases.