Non-Compete/Non-Competition Clause In Singapore

by 4 December 2024Knowledge & Insights

Navigating the complexities of the workplace and employment laws can be challenging, particularly when understanding the implications of non-compete clauses. These contractual provisions, designed to limit an employee’s ability to engage in competitive activities during or after the employment period especially for the same industry.

The non-compete clause in Singapore is enforceable and can have far-reaching implications for employers and employees. This article delves into the intricacies of non-competes in Singapore’s legal framework, discussing their scope, duration, enforceability, and the legal remedies available during a breach.

Non-Compete Clauses Legal Framework

The legal framework surrounding non-compete clauses in Singapore is rooted in contract law, which governs the rights and obligations of all contracting parties. In the employment context, non-compete clauses, also known as restraint of trade clauses, are particularly significant.

These clauses protect an employer’s legitimate business interests by preventing former employees from engaging in activities that could harm the employer’s business, such as joining a competing business or exploiting trade secrets and confidential information.

However, the Singapore Courts have established that the enforceability of such clauses in employment contracts depends on their reasonableness and whether they protect legitimate proprietary interests without being overly restrictive.

This legal framework ensures that non-compete agreements are fair and do not unnecessarily limit an individual’s ability to find future job opportunities or create unfair advantages for employers.

Overview Of Contract Law In Singapore

Contract law in Singapore is a comprehensive system designed to protect the rights and responsibilities of all parties involved in an agreement. Within the employment sector, contract law plays an important role in setting out the terms of employment and outlining the obligations of both employers and employees.

A common feature in employment contracts is the inclusion of non-compete clauses. These clauses protect a company’s proprietary information, competitive advantage, and customer relations by limiting an employee’s ability to engage in competitive activities after leaving the company.

For a non-compete clause to be enforceable, it must not impose an outright ban on the employee’s ability to work in the industry. Instead, it should be drafted to ensure it is reasonable and not exploitative.

Employees who feel they are subject to unfair clauses in their contracts can seek help from their unions, the Tripartite Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment Practices (TAFEP), or the Ministry of Manpower.

In recent years, complaints about restraint of trade clauses have been low due to efforts by tripartite partners to promote fair practices and educate employers.

The tripartite partners are also working to develop guidelines to provide more clarity on restraint of trade clauses in employment contracts.

Contract law in Singapore is a comprehensive system designed to protect the rights and responsibilities of all parties involved in an agreement. Within the employment sector, contract law plays an important role in setting out the terms of employment and outlining the obligations of both employers and employees.

A common feature in employment contracts is the inclusion of non-compete clauses. These clauses protect a company’s proprietary information, competitive advantage, and customer relations by limiting an employee’s ability to engage in competitive activities after leaving the company.

For a non-compete clause to be enforceable, it must not impose an outright ban on the employee’s ability to work in the industry. Instead, it should be drafted to ensure it is reasonable and not exploitative.

Employees who feel they are subject to unfair clauses in their contracts can seek help from their unions, the Tripartite Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment Practices (TAFEP), or the Ministry of Manpower.

In recent years, complaints about restraint of trade clauses have been low due to efforts by tripartite partners to promote fair practices and educate employers.

The tripartite partners are also working to develop guidelines to provide more clarity on restraint of trade clauses in employment contracts.

Validity And Enforceability Of Non-Compete Clauses

Non-compete clauses, also known as restraint of trade clauses, are often found in employment contracts in Singapore. These clauses aim to protect a business from competition by preventing former employees from working with competitors or starting a competing business for a certain period after leaving.

For a non-compete clause to be enforceable, it must be reasonable in scope, duration, and geographical coverage. The clause should not impose an excessive restriction on the employee’s ability to find work and should only protect legitimate business interests, such as confidential information or client relationships.

If the clause is too broad or restrictive, the Courts may find it an unjust restraint of trade, making it unenforceable. Singapore’s Courts carefully assess whether the non-compete clause strikes a fair balance between protecting the employer and allowing the employee to earn a living.

Employers can take legal action if they believe a non-compete clause has been breached by seeking an injunction to prevent the former employee from engaging in competitive activities.

However, such action must be justified by a genuine business interest, not as a means to unfairly limit the employee’s career opportunities.

 

Scope And Duration Of Non-Compete Clauses

The scope of non-competes generally refers to the activities that the employee is restricted from undertaking after leaving their job. It could involve working for a competitor, starting a competing business, or soliciting clients or colleagues from a former employer.

The duration, however, refers to the time the restrictions apply post-employment. For both scope and duration, the principle of reasonableness applies. A non-compete clause with an extensive scope or a longer duration may be considered unreasonable and, therefore, unenforceable.

Each case is evaluated on its merits, considering factors like the nature of the business, the employee’s role, and the potential impact on the employee’s livelihood.

 

Is The Non-Compete Clause Enforceable In Singapore?

Non-compete clauses are a common feature in employment contracts in Singapore. They are designed to restrict employees from joining or starting a competing business after leaving their current employer.

However, the enforceability of such a non-compete clause in Singapore is not straightforward and depends on several factors. The Singapore Courts evaluate these clauses based on their reasonableness and whether they protect the employer’s legitimate proprietary interest.

Legitimate Proprietary Interest

For a non-compete clause to be enforceable, it must protect a legitimate proprietary interest of the employer. In Singapore, legitimate proprietary interests often include client and trade connections, trade secrets, and other confidential information that are considered crucial to the employer’s business.

The Singapore Courts recognise that an employer has the right to safeguard these proprietary interests to prevent competitors from gaining an unfair advantage through the knowledge or relationships built during the employee’s tenure.

Reasonableness

Even when a non-compete clause is designed to protect a legitimate proprietary interest, it must still be reasonable in its scope, duration, and geographical coverage to be enforceable. The Singapore Courts apply a reasonableness test to determine whether the clause is fair to both parties.

Scope Of Activity

The scope of the restricted activity is a critical factor. If the non-compete clause imposes a blanket prohibition that prevents the employee from working in the same industry, regardless of the similarity between the new role and the previous one, it is likely to be deemed unreasonable.

The Courts look for a balance, ensuring that the restriction is specific enough to protect the employer’s legitimate proprietary interests without unfairly limiting the employee’s ability to find suitable employment.

Duration

The duration of the non-compete clause is another key consideration. The period of restraint should not be longer than necessary to protect the employer’s interests.

A clause without a fixed duration or one that extends beyond what is reasonable for the industry and role may be deemed unreasonable by the Civil Courts. In general, the shorter and more targeted the duration, the more likely the clause will be enforceable.

Geographical Coverage

The geographical scope of the non-compete clause is also crucial. A clause with no geographical limit or one that covers an excessively broad area is likely to be deemed unreasonable.

The Singapore Courts prefer clauses that are narrowly tailored to the regions where the employer’s business operates and where the employee’s activities could genuinely impact the company’s interests.

 

Enforcement And Remedies

In cases where a valid non-compete clause is breached, the employer has several legal remedies available. These include seeking an injunction to prevent the further breach and claiming damages for losses suffered due to the breach.

However, claiming damages often requires proof of actual loss, which can be challenging. It’s worth noting that the Courts may refuse to enforce a non-compete clause if they deem it unreasonable, even if the parties have agreed to it.

 

Considerations For Employees And Employers

For employees, it’s crucial to understand the implications of a non-compete clause before signing an employment contract. If the restrictions are too broad or the duration too long, it may significantly limit their career opportunities post-employment.

For employers, while non-competes protect their business interests, they must ensure these clauses are reasonable and fair. Striking a balance between business protection and freedom of employment is essential to crafting an enforceable non-compete clause.

Relevant Statistics And Cases On Non-Compete Issues

While quantifiable data on the enforcement of non-compete clauses in Singapore is limited, several notable cases show how the Courts handle these issues.

In a 2012 case involving a dental surgery clinic, the High Court upheld a six-month non-compete clause for a former employee, finding it reasonable based on the circumstances of the employment.

More recently, a case involving Shopee, a major e-commerce platform, highlighted the complexities of non-compete clauses.

In this case, a former Shopee employee was restricted from joining any competitors for 12 months after leaving the company. The dispute arose when the ex-employee accepted a role at ByteDance, the parent company of TikTok.

Shopee argued that the employee’s roles at both companies were “substantially similar,” despite the employee’s claim that his responsibilities at Shopee were focused on Brazil, where TikTok Shop was not operating.

Shopee sought injunctions to prevent the ex-employee from working with ByteDance, soliciting Shopee’s clients and employees, and joining its competitors.

However, the Singapore Court dismissed the injunctions, ruling that Shopee had not established a serious question regarding the breach of the non-compete clause.

The dismissal was also due to the lack of legitimate proprietary interest and the unreasonable geographical restriction imposed by the clause.

 

Best Practices And Practical Tips

When crafting non-compete clauses, tailoring them to specific roles and limiting their duration and geographical scope to what is necessary to protect both the employee and employer’s legitimate interests is a recommended practice for employers.

In particular, an employer should ensure that each non-compete clause is customised to the individual employee, considering the nature of their role, access to confidential information, and relationships with clients.

To tread it effectively, it is paramount to understand its nuances. Both employers and employees need to take heed of certain practices to ensure they protect their interests whilst maintaining a fair and legal approach. Here are some expanded tips and best practices:

For Employers

Tailor The Clause To The Employee

It’s not prudent to use a uniform non-compete clause for all employees. The role, level, and responsibilities of each employee vary, as does their access to sensitive business information. For instance, a clause that suits a senior executive might be inappropriate for a junior analyst. Tailoring non-competes to individual circumstances makes them more likely to be upheld by the Court.

Imposing Reasonable Restrictions

A non-compete clause should be designed such that the scope, duration, and geographical limitations are reasonable. Overly restrictive clauses can seem predatory or unfair, which can make them unenforceable in Court. Also, a reasonable clause is likely to receive less resistance from the employee, leading to a harmonious professional relationship.

Clearly Define Prohibited Activities

Be explicit about the activities the employee cannot engage in after leaving the company. Generalised or vague prohibitions can lead to confusion and potential disputes, and may be deemed unenforceable.

Regularly Review And Update Clauses

Business needs, market conditions, and employee roles are dynamic. As such, employers should regularly review non-competes to ensure they remain appropriate, relevant, and legal.

For Employees

Understand Before Signing

Always ensure you fully understand the implications of a non-compete clause before signing your employment contract. Consider consulting with a legal professional if you’re unsure about any aspect of the clause or if it seems excessively restrictive.

Negotiate The Terms

If you believe the non-compete clause to be too broad or restrictive, remember that you have the right to negotiate its terms. Negotiations can encompass aspects such as the duration of the clause, geographical scope, and what precisely constitutes competition.

Seek Legal Advice

If you’re uncertain about how a non-compete clause may impact your future employment opportunities, don’t hesitate to consult with a legal expert. Legal advice is especially important if you’re facing enforcement of a non-compete clause upon leaving a job.

Keep A Copy Of Your Contract

Always retain a copy of your employment contract and any subsequent amendments, including the non-compete clause. This is an important reference point in the case of any future disputes or misunderstanding regarding your post-employment obligations.

 

Conclusion On Non-Compete Clauses In Singapore

Non-compete clauses in Singapore play a vital role in protecting businesses by preventing employees from engaging in activities that could harm their former employers. However, the enforceability of these clauses depends on careful drafting and a thorough understanding of Singapore’s legal framework.

The Singapore Courts require that non-compete clauses be reasonable in their scope, duration, and geographical coverage. This ensures they protect legitimate business interests without unfairly restricting an employee’s ability to earn a living.

In Singapore’s dynamic employment landscape, a well-considered approach to non-competition agreements can effectively safeguard business interests while ensuring fair play and respecting employee rights.

If you believe that a non-compete clause in your contract might be detrimental, consulting with an employment lawyer is advisable.

For more information on navigating non-compete clauses and other corporate matters in Singapore, contact Tembusu Law. As corporate and business lawyers in Singapore, we advise startups, SMEs, and multinational corporations across various industries, including hospitality, technology, and e-commerce.

We help companies navigate regulatory changes, enhance operations, and create long-term value for their clients and stakeholders.

Contact Tembusu Law today. Our team of commercial and corporate lawyers in Singapore is ready to assist you in safeguarding your business and ensuring compliance with the law.

 

Frequently Asked Questions About Non-Compete Clauses In Singapore

How Can An Employee Negotiate A Non-Compete Clause?

An employee can try to negotiate the terms of a non-compete clause by limiting its scope, reducing its duration, narrowing its geographical coverage, or even seeking a compensatory clause for the period of restriction. It’s recommended to speak with a professional when negotiating such an agreement.

Can A Court Modify A Non-Compete Clause?

While the ‘blue-pencil test’ (a doctrine allowing Courts to modify unreasonable contracts to make them reasonable) is not usually applicable in Singapore, the Court may refuse to enforce an unreasonable non-compete clause.

Are Non-Compete Clauses Necessary In All Employment Contracts?

Not necessarily. Non-compete clauses are typically used when employees can access confidential information, such as trade secrets, confidential business strategies, or key clients. Such a clause may only be necessary for roles with access to such information.

What Happens If An Employer Enforces An Unreasonable Non-Compete Clause?

If a non-compete clause is deemed unreasonable, it may be cited unenforceable. This means the employer may be unable to prevent the employee from engaging in competitive activities, and any attempt to do so could lead to legal repercussions.

What Is A “Restraint Of Trade” Clause?

A “restraint of trade” clause is a type of agreement that restricts an individual’s ability to conduct business or trade freely. In an employment context, a non-compete clause is a form of restraint of trade designed to prevent an employee from competing with the employer during and after employment.

What Does “Undue Hardship” Mean In A Non-Compete Clause?

“Undue hardship” refers to the excessive burden or difficulty placed on an employee due to a non-compete clause. If a clause is so restrictive that it significantly inhibits an employee’s ability to find suitable work after leaving a company, it may be considered to cause undue hardship and could be deemed unenforceable.

Can An Employer Enforce A Non-Compete Clause If They Terminate An Employee?

Whether a non-compete clause can be enforced following termination largely depends on the specific circumstances and the wording of the clause. It may be enforceable if the contract states that the clause applies to any form of termination. However, if the termination was unfair or without cause, a Court may be less likely to enforce the clause.

Are Non-Compete Clauses Applicable To All Industries In Singapore?

While non-competes can technically be used in any industry, they are more common in sectors where employees can access sensitive information, proprietary knowledge, or key customer relationships. These sectors include technology, finance, consultancy, and senior management roles across various industries.

What Is The Significance Of Geographical Limits In A Non-Compete Clause In Singapore?

Geographical limits in a non-compete clause specify the region where the former employee is prohibited from competing with their previous employer. In Singapore, for such a clause to be enforceable, the geographical scope should be reasonable and commensurate with the employer’s legitimate business interests. For instance, a worldwide restriction may be seen as overly broad for a local business with no international operations. If the geographical limit is too extensive and deemed unreasonable by the Court, it could render the entire non-compete clause unenforceable.

About the author

About the author

Tembusu Law

Jonathan is the Founder and Managing Director of Tembusu Law. He is also the founder of LawGuide Singapore, a prominent legaltech startup which successfully created and launched Singapore’s first legal chatbot in 2017.

LET'S TALK

We'll always make time for you. Tell us what's on your mind and we'll find a way to help.